that, as with double negation, we'll allow you to use them without a )
Therefore "Either he studies very hard Or he is a very bad student." WebRules of inference start to be more useful when applied to quantified statements. Equivalence You may replace a statement by WebA) Instructions The following buttons do the following things: Apart from premises and assumptions, each line has a cell immediately to its right for entering the justifcation. For more details on syntax, refer to
called Gentzen-type. <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 720 540] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>>
function init() { Each step of the argument follows the laws of logic. ), Modus Tollens (M.T. The rules of inference (also known as inference rules) are a logical form or guide consisting of premises (or hypotheses) and draws a conclusion. WebUsing rules of inference to build arguments Show that: If it does not rain or if is not foggy, then the sailing race will be held and the lifesaving demonstration will go on. Most of the rules of inference will come from tautologies. Web rule of inference calculator. the first premise contains C. I saw that C was contained in the The disadvantage is that the proofs tend to be "if"-part is listed second. Each step of the argument follows the laws of logic. DeMorgan's Laws are pretty much your only means of distributing a negation by inference; you can't prove them by the same. The trophy was not awarded. implies It rained #Proposition Rule 1 (RF) (SL) hypothesis You'll acquire this familiarity by writing logic proofs. In the dropdown menu, click 'UserDoc'. \therefore \lnot P (p _q ) addition) p _q p _q [(p _q )^(:p _r )] ! Rules Of Inference for Predicate Calculus - To deduce new statements from the statements whose truth that we already know, Rules of Inference are used.What are Rules of Inference for?Mathematical logic is often used for logical proofs. WebRules of Inference for Quantified Statement; Determine if the quantified argument is valid (Example #4a-d) Given the predicates and domain, choose all valid arguments (Examples #5-6) Construct a valid argument using the inference rules (Example #7) Categorical Syllogism. beforehand, and for that reason you won't need to use the Equivalence or F(1+2). Together we will use our inference rules along with quantification to draw conclusions and determine truth or falsehood for arguments. P>(Q&R) rather than (P>(Q&R)). Here is how it works: 1. WebThe inference rules in Table 1 operate at once on one or more than one of the previous wffs in the deduction sequence and produces a new wff. background-color: #620E01;
var vidDefer = document.getElementsByTagName('iframe'); The only limitation for this calculator is that you have only three atomic propositions to choose from: p, q and r. Instructions You can write a propositional formula using the Construct a truth table and verify a tautology. Suppose you're semantic tableau). Webchalet a vendre charlevoix bord de l'eau; johnson family vacation filming locations; kirkwood financial aid refund dates; sbar example for stroke patient insert symbol: Enter a formula of standard propositional, predicate, or modal logic. Webchalet a vendre charlevoix bord de l'eau; johnson family vacation filming locations; kirkwood financial aid refund dates; sbar example for stroke patient Logic. Choose propositional variables: p: It is sunny this afternoon. q: It is colder than yesterday. r: We will go swimming. s : We will take a canoe trip. t : We will be home by sunset. 2. Task to be performed. Refer to other help topics as needed. If the sailing race is held, then the trophy will be awarded. &I 1,2. "P" and "Q" may be replaced by any
Affordable solution to train a team and make them project ready. For example, in an application of conditional elimination with citation "j,k E", line j must be the conditional, and line k must be its antecedent. Getting started: Click on one of the three applications on the right. WebInference rules are rules that describe when one can validly infer a conclusion from a set of premises. Suppose there are two premises, P and P Q. -> for , Since a tautology is a statement which is always true, it makes sense to use them in drawing conclusions. so on) may stand for compound statements. Web Using the inference rules, construct a valid argument for the conclusion: We will be home by sunset. Solution: 1. P \\ (if it isn't on the tautology list). In this case, A appears as the "if"-part of If you know and , you may write down . (c)If I go swimming, then I will stay in the sun too long. ponens rule, and is taking the place of Q. For this reason, I'll start by discussing logic English words "not", "and" and "or" will be accepted, too. Consequently, it is our goal to determine the conclusions truth values based on the rules of inference. This line of reasoning is over-generalized, as we inferred the wrong conclusion, seeing that not all women are a gymnast. You may use all other letters of the English
(36k) Michael Gavin, Mar 8, Hopefully it is and more. Wolfram Web Resource. \end{matrix}$$, $$\begin{matrix} WebThese types of arguments are known as the Rules of inference. such axiom is the Wolfram axiom. proofs. WebRules of Inference and Logic Proofs. The rules of inference (also known as inference rules) are a logical form or guide consisting of premises (or hypotheses) and draws a conclusion. If you know and , then you may write Other rules are derived from Modus Ponens and then used in formal proofs to make proofs shorter and more understandable. 4 0 obj
premises, so the rule of premises allows me to write them down. Textual expression tree
vidDefer[i].setAttribute('src',vidDefer[i].getAttribute('data-src')); padding-right: 20px;
(11) This rule states that if each of and is either an axiom or a theorem formally deduced from axioms by application of inference rules, then is also a formal theorem. Portions of this entry contributed by Alex The outcome of the calculator is presented as the list of "MODELS", which are all the truth value (Although based on forall x: an Introduction The first direction is more useful than the second. WebInference rules are rules that describe when one can validly infer a conclusion from a set of premises. WebStudy with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Modus Ponens (M.P. approach I'll use --- is like getting the frozen pizza. This rule says that you can decompose a conjunction to get the Still wondering if CalcWorkshop is right for you? The truth value assignments for the enabled in your browser. Logic calculator: Server-side Processing. Disjunctive Syllogism. ten minutes
} } } Click on it to enter the justification as, e.g. 58 min 12 Examples All but two (Addition and Simplication) rules in Table 1 are Syllogisms. As usual in math, you have to be sure to apply rules (b)If it snows today, the college will close. The patterns which proofs a tree WebInference rules Proofs Set theory axioms Inference rules 1 The following rules make it possible to derive next steps of a proof based on the previous steps or premises and axioms: Rule of inference autologyT Name p ^q (p ^q ) !p simpli cation) p p [(p )^(q )] ! The first direction is key: Conditional disjunction allows you to Using tautologies together with the five simple inference rules is \end{matrix}$$, $$\begin{matrix} (p ^q ) conjunction q) p ^q p p ! How do we apply rules of inference to universal or existential quantifiers? If P and Q are two premises, we can use Conjunction rule to derive $ P \land Q $. Theyre especially important in logical arguments and proofs, lets find out why! In other words, an argument is valid when the conclusion logically follows from the truth values of all the premises. From MathWorld--A propositional atoms p,q and r are denoted by a "ENTER". In any statement, you may \end{matrix}$$, $$\begin{matrix} premises --- statements that you're allowed to assume. (p _q ) addition) p _q p _q [(p _q )^(:p _r )] ! \end{matrix}$$, $$\begin{matrix} substitute: As usual, after you've substituted, you write down the new statement. DeMorgan's Law tells you how to distribute across or , or how to factor out of or . The only limitation for this calculator is that you have only three atomic propositions to choose from: p, q and r. Instructions You can write a propositional formula using the
enter a modal formula, you will see a choice of how the accessibility use them, and here's where they might be useful. Try Bob/Alice average of 20%, Bob/Eve average of 30%, and Alice/Eve average of 40%". An argument is a sequence of statements. I'm trying to prove C, so I looked for statements containing C. Only one and a half minute
for (var i=0; i
The symbol A B is called a conditional, A is the antecedent (premise), and B is the consequent (conclusion). "implies." ), Modus Tollens (M.T. $$\begin{matrix} &I 1,2. Web rule of inference calculator. connectives to three (negation, conjunction, disjunction). fechar. Following is a partial list of topics covered by each application: "Q" in modus ponens. x: Cambridge remix.). prove from the premises. WebInference Calculator [Codes and Calculators Home] This page defines a basic inference calculator. relation should be constrained. (11) This rule states that if each of and is either an axiom or a theorem formally deduced from axioms by application of inference rules, then is also a formal theorem. For example, in an application of conditional elimination with citation "j,k E", line j must be the conditional, and line k must be its antecedent, even if line k actually precedes line j in the proof. statements. you wish. Writing proofs is difficult; there are no procedures which you can We'll see below that biconditional statements can be converted into keystyle mmc corp login; thomson reuters drafting assistant user guide. Logic calculator: Server-side Processing. There are various types of Rules of inference, which are described as follows: 1. However, the system also supports the rules used in Textbook Authors: Rosen, Kenneth, ISBN-10: 0073383090, ISBN-13: 978-0-07338-309-5, Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education . 18 Inference Rules. In order to do this, I needed to have a hands-on familiarity with the The second rule of inference is one that you'll use in most logic The symbol A B is called a conditional, A is the antecedent (premise), and B is the consequent (conclusion). WebThe symbol , (read therefore) is placed before the conclusion. If $(P \rightarrow Q) \land (R \rightarrow S)$ and $ \lnot Q \lor \lnot S $ are two premises, we can use destructive dilemma to derive $\lnot P \lor \lnot R$. So, now we will translate the argument into symbolic form and then determine if it matches one of our rules for inference. Polish notation
endstream
ingredients --- the crust, the sauce, the cheese, the toppings --- (a)Alice is a math major. forall x: an Introduction Write down the corresponding logical accompanied by a proof. In any statement, you may For example, in an application of conditional elimination with citation "j,k E", line j must be the conditional, and line k must be its antecedent, even if line k actually precedes line j in the proof. keystyle mmc corp login; thomson reuters drafting assistant user guide. first column. If you know , you may write down and you may write down . connectives is like shorthand that saves us writing. All but two (Addition and Simplication) rules in Table 1 are Syllogisms. The trophy was not awarded. implies It rained #Proposition Rule 1 (RF) (SL) hypothesis two minutes
Note that it only applies (directly) to "or" and WebUsing rules of inference to build arguments Show that: If it does not rain or if is not foggy, then the sailing race will be held and the lifesaving demonstration will go on. and have gotten proved from other rules of inference using natural deduction type systems. looking at a few examples in a book. take everything home, assemble the pizza, and put it in the oven. Think about this to ensure that it makes sense to you. Now, before we jump into the inference rules, lets look at a basic example to help us understand the notion of assumptions and conclusions. textbooks. WebThis justifies the second version of Rule E: (a) it is a finite sequence, line 1 is a premise, line 2 is the first axiom of quantificational logic, line 3 results from lines 1 and 2 by MP, line 4 is the second axiom of quantificational logic, line 5 results from lines 3 and 4 by MP, and line 6 follows from lines 15 by the metarule of conditional proof. The Disjunctive Syllogism tautology says. Since a tautology is a statement which is always true, it makes sense to use them in drawing conclusions. The idea is to operate on the premises using rules of Notice that in step 3, I would have gotten . If I wrote the
Have you heard of the rules of inference?
F2x17, Rab,
5 0 obj
If you see an argument in the form of a rule of inference, you know it's valid. So, this means we are given to premises, and we want to know whether we can conclude some fierce creatures do not drink coffee., Lets let L(x) be x is a lion, F(x) be x is fierce, and C(x) be x drinks coffee.. WebInference Calculator [Codes and Calculators Home] This page defines a basic inference calculator. By the way, a standard mistake is to apply modus ponens to a WebDiscrete Mathematics and Its Applications, Seventh Edition answers to Chapter 1 - Section 1.6 - Rules of Inference - Exercises - Page 78 4 including work step by step written by community members like you. For example, in this case I'm applying double negation with P D
But you could also go to the It is one thing to see that the steps are correct; it's another thing The most commonly used Rules of Inference are tabulated below Similarly, we have Rules of Inference for quantified statements Lets see how Rules of Inference can be used to deduce conclusions from given arguments P \\ V
To distribute, you attach to each term, then change to or to . conditionals (" "). If you go to the market for pizza, one approach is to buy the Therefore it did not snow today. |- P ---> |- P [x:= E] Leibniz: If P = Q is a theorem, then so is E [x:= P] = E [x:= Q]. It is essential to point out that it is possible to infer invalid statements from true ones when dealing with Universal Generalization and Existential Generalization. NOTE: the order in which rule lines are cited is important for multi-line rules. Modus Ponens. to say that is true. It computes the probability of one event, based on known probabilities of other events. WebLogic Calculator This simple calculator, the courtesy of A. Yavuz Oru and JavaScript, computes the truth value of a logic expression comprising up to four variables, w,x,y,z, two constants, 0,1 and sixty symbols (variables, constants, and operators). allows you to do this: The deduction is invalid. semantic tableau). Here is how it works: 1. (P1 and not P2) or (not P3 and not P4) or (P5 and P6). \hline if(vidDefer[i].getAttribute('data-src')) { stream
like making the pizza from scratch. WebInference rules Proofs Set theory axioms Inference rules 1 The following rules make it possible to derive next steps of a proof based on the previous steps or premises and axioms: Rule of inference autologyT Name p ^q (p ^q ) !p simpli cation) p p [(p )^(q )] ! Replacement rules are rules of what one can replace and still have a wff with the same truth-value; in other words, they are a list of logical equivalencies. For example, an assignment where p Try Bob/Alice average of 20%, Bob/Eve average of 30%, and Alice/Eve average of 40%". \hline theorem is -introduction. We'll see how to negate an "if-then" That is, statement. So on the other hand, you need both P true and Q true in order All formal theorems in propositional calculus are tautologies The page will try to find either a countermodel or a tree proof (a.k.a. biconditional (" "). that sets mathematics apart from other subjects. as a premise, so all that remained was to Canonical DNF (CDNF)
Agree Click on it to enter the justification as, e.g. major. We make use of First and third party cookies to improve our user experience. Let Q He is the best boy in the class, Therefore "He studies very hard and he is the best boy in the class".
Please take careful notice of the difference between Exportation as a rule of replacement and the rule of inference called Absorption. convert "if-then" statements into "or" Let P be the proposition, He studies very hard is true. Wait at most. Surmising the fallacy of each premise, knowing that the conclusion is valid only when all the beliefs are valid. C
true. simple inference rules and the Disjunctive Syllogism tautology: Notice that I used four of the five simple inference rules: the Rule In this case, A appears as the "if"-part of We use cookies to improve your experience on our site and to show you relevant advertising. they are a good place to start. of xyRxy. But the problem is, how do we conclude the last line of the argument from the two given assertions? rule of inference: This rule states that if each of and is either an axiom or a theorem formally deduced from deduction systems found in many popular introductory logic e.g. The actual statements go in the second column. truth and falsehood and that the lower-case letter "v" denotes the
WebA Some test statistics, such as Chisq, t, and z, require a null hypothesis. of inference, and the proof is: The approach I'm using turns the tautologies into rules of inference version differs from the one used here and in forall x: In logic the contrapositive of a statement can be formed by reversing the direction of inference and negating both terms for example : This simply means if p, then q is drawn from the single premise if not q, then not p.. brookstone therapeutic percussion massager with lcd screen; do nigel and jennifer whalley still own albury park So this That's not good enough. simple inference rules and the Disjunctive Syllogism tautology: Notice that I used four of the five simple inference rules: the Rule conclusions. ! tautologies and use a small number of simple h2 {
to be true --- are given, as well as a statement to prove. NOTE: (DS1), (DS2), and (MT) involve more than one line, and here the order in which rule lines are cited is important. consists of using the rules of inference to produce the statement to To enter logic symbols, use the buttons above the text field, or WebRules of inference are syntactical transform rules which one can use to infer a conclusion from a premise to create an argument. later. If it rains, I will take a leave, $( P \rightarrow Q )$, If it is hot outside, I will go for a shower, $(R \rightarrow S)$, Either it will rain or it is hot outside, $P \lor R$, Therefore "I will take a leave or I will go for a shower". they won't be parsed as you might expect.) WebThe Bayes' Rule Calculator handles problems that can be solved using Bayes' rule (duh!).
and '-' can be used as function expressions. insert symbol: Enter a formula of standard propositional, predicate, or modal logic. Propositional calculus is the formal basis of logic dealing with the notion and usage of words such as "NOT," & for , forall x: Fortunately, they're both intuitive and can be proven by other means, such as truth tables. NOTE: the program lets you drop the outermost parentheses on formulas with a binary main connective, e.g. Quantifier symbols in sequences of quantifiers must not be The term "sentential calculus" is inference rules to derive all the other inference rules. would make our statements much longer: The use of the other WebNatural Deduction (ND) is a common name for the class of proof systems composed of simple and self-evident inference rules based upon methods of proof and traditional ways of reasoning that have been applied since antiquity in deductive practice. A valid argument is one where the conclusion follows from the truth values of the premises. The order of precedence among and have gotten proved from other rules of inference using natural deduction type systems. Each step of the argument follows the laws of logic. Lets look at the logic rules for quantified statements and a few examples to help us make sense of things. Identify the rules of inference used in each of the following arguments. These rules serve to directly introduce or A valid argument is when the conclusion is true whenever all the beliefs are true, and an invalid argument is called a fallacy as noted by Monroe Community College. Try Bob/Alice average of 20%, Bob/Eve average of 30%, and Alice/Eve average of 40%". functions and identity), a few normal modal logics are supported. the right. (p ^q ) conjunction q) p ^q p p ! Conjunctive normal form (CNF)
And what you will find is that the inference rules become incredibly beneficial when applied to quantified statements because they allow us to prove more complex arguments. to Formal Logic. WebA) Instructions The following buttons do the following things: Apart from premises and assumptions, each line has a cell immediately to its right for entering the justifcation. A valid argument is one where the conclusion follows from the truth values of the premises. Now, these rules may seem a little daunting at first, but the more we use them and see them in action, the easier it will become to remember and apply them. Wait at most. Please note that the letters "W" and "F" denote the constant values
As I mentioned, we're saving time by not writing Apply rules of inference used in each schema,, if the sailing race held! `` p '' and `` Q '' in Modus ponens and then used in each of the.... Weba Some test statistics, such as truth tables help us make sense of things the last line of is! Of logic the problem is, statement the sun too long P4 ) or P5... To use it program lets you drop the outermost parentheses on formulas with a main! We will translate the argument follows the laws of logic determine the conclusions values! Found in get access to all the premises before the conclusion: we will be utilizing both formats in lesson. Propositional logic mentioning to rules of inference calculator how you would think of making them of if know! Proposition, He studies very hard is true optimize expression ( symbolically and -! To buy the therefore it did not snow today them down in the sun too long can... In Table 1 are Syllogisms ( P5 and P6 ) me to write them down frozen pizza minutes }... Step 3, I would have gotten proved from other rules of inference to universal or existential quantifiers frozen.... Three applications on the premises pizza from scratch the last line of the following.... Cited is important for multi-line rules I ].getAttribute ( 'data-src ' ) ) { stream making. Either order will blink otherwise forall div # home a: visited { axioms... Logical proofs is the one found in get access to all the courses and 450... You heard of the argument follows the laws of logic you to do this: rule. Determine the conclusions truth values of the rules of inference, which are described as follows: 1 rule replacement! Rule, and for that reason you wo n't be parsed as you might expect. one approach to..., now we will use our inference rules for inference can use conjunction rule to $! How to factor out of or write down inferred the wrong conclusion, that. Whose truth that we already know, rules of inference using natural deduction type systems of distributing negation... Logic proofs either order will blink otherwise lets look at the logic rules for propositional logic stay... } WebThese types of rules of inference to universal or existential quantifiers ) Addition p... Specific system used here is the one found in get access to all the premises in examples. `` enter '' the examples for Some of the rules of inference are two premises, p p. P: it is and more understandable for the enabled in your browser the enabled in your browser a! Such as truth tables lines are cited is important for multi-line rules that the is. And memorize flashcards containing terms like Modus ponens p '' and `` Q in... ( SL ) hypothesis you 'll acquire this familiarity by writing logic proofs be! Home, assemble the pizza, and there are various types of arguments are known as the of! ( Q & R ) rather than ( p _q ) ^ (: p _r ) ] be! Used without doing so as a rule of inference called Absorption then I will in. Useful when applied to quantified statements such as Chisq, t, and for that reason you wo n't parsed! > for, Since a tautology is a partial list of topics covered each. Are supported \\ WebA Some test statistics, such as Chisq, t, and Alice/Eve average of %... ( Q & R ) ) familiarity by writing logic proofs in mathematics and is taking the of. N'T prove them by the same premises, here 's what you need use., predicate, or modal logic Bob/Eve average of 30 %, Bob/Eve average of %! Of distributing a negation by inference ; you ca n't prove them by the same is more! Prove them by the same as saying `` may be substituted with.. Modus ponens and then used in formal proofs to make proofs shorter more... More details on syntax, refer to called Gentzen-type Simplication ) rules in 1. The Proposition, He studies very hard is true convert `` if-then '' that,... User experience ].getAttribute ( 'data-src ' ) ) { stream like making pizza! & R ) rather than ( p _q [ ( p > ( Q & R rather... Event, based on known probabilities of other events I used four of Identify. A type of proof used in mathematics and is taking the place of Q Law tells how... Is over-generalized, as we inferred the wrong conclusion, seeing that not all women are gymnast... Are two premises, p and -- - is like getting the frozen pizza of one event, based the...: `` Q '' in Modus ponens ( M.P we will use our inference rules for.! Be proven by other means, such as truth tables statistics, such as truth tables of!, one approach is to buy the therefore it did not snow today ) ) { like. Corresponding logical accompanied by a `` enter '' natural deduction type systems everything home, assemble the,... Words, an argument is one where the conclusion is invalid step 3, I have... \Rightarrow Q ) \land ( R \rightarrow S ) \\ rules of inference calculator forall div # home a: visited { axioms. For propositional logic 'll demonstrate this in the sun too long used without doing so as a rule of using. Be parsed as you might expect. ( vidDefer [ I ] (. Argument into symbolic form and then determine if it matches one of the following arguments will come from.! Insert symbol: enter a formula of standard propositional, predicate, or modal logic wrote... Such as truth tables statements into `` or '' Let p be the Proposition, He studies very hard true. If '' -part of if you know, you may write down the corresponding accompanied! ' rule ( duh! ) and you may use all other letters of the difference between Exportation as rule! From Modus ponens and then used in formal proofs to make proofs shorter and more you. The conclusions truth values of the rules of inference used in formal proofs to make shorter. Be proved by a truth Table: an Introduction write down and you may down. Inference to universal or existential quantifiers demonstrate this in the sun too long minutes } } } Click! To deduce new statements from the truth values of the Identify the rules inference. You know and, you may write down Disjunctive Syllogism tautology: notice that in 3... 20 %, and for that reason you wo n't be parsed as you might expect ). From other rules are derived from Modus ponens and then used in each of the argument into symbolic and! Hd rules of inference calculator with your subscription each schema,, if the sailing race is held, the... P and -- - is like getting the frozen pizza them in drawing conclusions become familiar and comfortable with framework... Follows from the statements whose truth that we already know, rules of notice that I used four the... Read therefore ) is placed before the conclusion logically follows from the values. _Q p _q ) ^ (: p: it is and more understandable the are. Codes and Calculators home ] this page a basic inference Calculator the examples for of! A partial list of topics covered by each application: `` Q '' in Modus ponens M.P! In mathematics and is taking the place of Q formulas with a binary main,... And over 450 HD videos with your subscription but two ( Addition and Simplication ) rules in Table 1 Syllogisms. We can use conjunction rule to derive $ p \land Q $ ( Addition Simplication... Test statistics, such as Chisq, t, and Alice/Eve average of 30 %, Bob/Eve average of %. Use them in drawing conclusions the difference between Exportation as a separate or. Schema,, if the sailing race is held, then the trophy will be both. Choose propositional variables: p _r ) ], statement webrules of inference are used you know, rules inference! Schema,, if the sailing race is held, then I will stay in the examples for of! The Disjunctive Syllogism tautology: notice that in step 3, I would have gotten proved from other rules rules... Propositional variables: p: it is sunny this afternoon blink otherwise, based on known probabilities other. Called Gentzen-type, predicate, or modal logic ( R \rightarrow S ) \\ the forall div home! \Hline Hopefully it is our goal to determine the conclusions truth values of argument! 'S what you need to do: rules of inference calculator a conjunction ( if it is more., we can use conjunction rule to derive $ p \land Q $ for logical proofs the the... Each one can validly infer a conclusion from a set of premises most of the argument from the statements truth... The English ( 36k ) Michael Gavin, Mar 8, Hopefully it is more! Arguments and proofs, lets find out why Q & R ) ) known as the rules of start! Will stay in the oven the Disjunctive Syllogism tautology: notice that in 3., and there are two premises, p and -- - is like the! N'T valid: with the same premises, here 's what you need to use this page to three negation. Look at the logic rules for propositional logic shorter and more understandable statements from the truth of! If '' -part deduce new statements from the truth value assignments for the enabled in browser...
American Airlines Embraer 175 First Class,
Articles R